Burnout Beyond Exhaustion: The Loss of the Physician Self in Modern Medicine

Burnout's Familiar Story

Most accounts of physician burnout cite a familiar list: too many hours, too many clicks, too many patients, and too little time. The cause would seem clear. Doctors are exhausted and burned out. But the key point of this book is that burnout is not just about overwork or fatigue. Instead, it is a deeper injury. It is the destabilization of professional self-recognition and identity.

To be clear, burnout is real and can be severe. The research discussion cites exhaustion, depersonalization, cynicism, and reduced efficacy. It shifts medicine away from the myth that good physicians simply absorb strain in silence [1-4].

The burnout narrative is often too limited when it frames the problem solely as emotional exhaustion or an energy deficit. Physicians do not just mean, "I am tired." Instead, they are voicing deeper concerns: "This is not how I expected to practice medicine," "I spend more time justifying care than delivering it," and "I am uncertain what kind of physician I am becoming within this system." These statements highlight that the fundamental issue is not just fatigue but a crisis of professional identity—illustrating the growing disconnect between the physician a person was trained to be and the realities enforced by the system.

A physician may spend more time anxiously defending treatment than thoughtfully choosing it. Prior authorization denials can be overturned, but only after a needless, frustrating peer review that can make one feel powerless. Documentation grows longer and more draining yet offers no relief or clarity. Quality metrics often reward what’s easily measured rather than what truly matters, leaving professionals feeling unrecognized and empty. Discharge plans may be praised as efficient, even when everyone knows they are fragile and destined to break hearts. None of this is rare. That, unfortunately, is the lingering heartache.

I contend that some physician burnout is best seen as the visible sign of a deeper injury: the erosion of professional self-recognition. Burnout is the surface manifestation; the underlying injury is moral distress, ethically experienced. The severity stems from harm to professional identity. Heinz Kohut, whom we will discuss later, offers insight into how such injury arises when the environment fails to support the self-required by the profession [5-9,17-23].

This is not to say that all burnout is injury to identity alone. Nor is it to say that all institutions cause harm, or that physicians possess absolute moral authority. Medicine is complex, often painfully so. Doctors juggle resources, follow regulations, guard patient safety, manage access, and face wrenching trade-offs. The question that pierces through: What becomes of the physician when constraints again and again force them to practice in ways that feel foreign to their own sense of self?

What Clinicians Recognize Before They Name It

Physicians can tolerate enormous strain if the work remains coherent. A difficult call night, an unexpected death, a long clinic, or a tough family meeting can leave a physician depleted but intact. This is true if the work feels recognizably medical, the team is genuine, and the purpose is credible. Difficulty alone does not injure identity.

Deeper injury arises when work persists but no longer expresses the physician’s clinical or moral self. The physician endures. The role endures. Their connection fades.

Many physicians today describe their experience in medicine not just in terms of fatigue, but as a form of estrangement. They are often troubled by the requirement to translate complex clinical realities into institutional language that omits or misrepresents professional experience. This shift results in physicians being held responsible for outcomes even as their authority to influence care is diminished. The core problem is not merely exhaustion; it is the loss of professional agency and meaning.

This injury is often silent. It can look like competence—a mask worn with steady hands. From the outside, it may seem mature, pragmatic, or even admirable. Sometimes it is. Many adaptations here are intelligent responses to restrictions. Physicians adapt because patients still need care, and in doing so, their hearts echo with quiet courage. Yet, each repeated adjustment erodes something essential. What begins as practicality hardens into resignation, narrowing faith in the work and in self, leaving an aching emptiness where hope once lived.

This internal narrowing of engagement is easily misinterpreted. It might be labeled as cynicism, disengagement, or unprofessionalism. While these labels sometimes apply, often the physician’s capacity to care has not disappeared—they have learned to withdraw care where the system does not support it. This is a rational preservation of moral energy, learned from repeated evidence that full engagement often comes at great personal cost and has limited effect.

The essential question is why so many remain, even though they feel less recognizable to themselves.

Clarifying why this happens requires going beyond workload analysis. A deeper language and framework are needed to address how the disruption of professional identity contributes to burnout.

A Practical Lens: Kohut and the Physician Self

Heinz Kohut may seem an unlikely guide. An Austrian-American psychoanalyst whose main work came in the 1960s and 1970s, he did not write about prior authorization or insurance denials. He wrote about the self: how it forms, stays whole, and fails when deprived of sustaining response [20-23].

Kohut's main contribution goes beyond proposing another theory of symptoms. He argues that distress can result from relationship failures, not just from individual flaws. He believes psychological coherence comes from environments that recognize people, support their ideals, and foster a sense of belonging.

Kohut used the term "self object" to refer to people or structures outside the individual that help the self remain cohesive. The term can sound strange, but the point is simple: the self is supported by response. We remain ourselves partly because the world stabilizes and connects us in ways we may not notice until they fail.

Kohut described three sustaining functions. Mirroring is recognition of effort and value. Idealization is relying on something bigger, steadier, and more coherent. Twinship is belonging with others who share a recognizable way of life. In professional life, these become recognition, coherence, and a sense of belonging.

Physicians do not need psychoanalytic terms to know this. They know when clinical judgment registers versus when it vanishes into a portal. They see the difference between institutions striving to live their missions and those with only surface-level mission language. They know the difference between practicing among colleagues who share a moral reality and practicing in isolation.

Kohut is best used as a lens. He helps clarify why modern practice can feel not only burdensome but also disorganized. He explains why a physician may tolerate long hours better than unclear policies. He clarifies why being overruled by a process feels different from being challenged by a colleague. He shows why a system that praises doctors while discounting their judgment can cause a distinctive kind of injury.

The main argument is that physicians’ professional identity relies on true institutional recognition, coherence, and belonging. When these elements decline, sustaining a cohesive professional self becomes very challenging for physicians.

Recognition, Coherence, and Belonging in Medicine

Medical education is not just about knowledge and skills; it is also about belonging. Students and residents learn judgment, courage, when to speak, how to tolerate uncertainty, what suffering must be witnessed, and the obligations of the physician. Literature on professional identity formation notes that physicians do not simply learn medicine; they learn to be physicians. A physician's professional self is shaped by an environment where judgment carries consequences, ideals retain credibility, and colleagues recognize one another as part of a shared moral enterprise.

A physician can tolerate disagreement when disagreement makes clinical sense. Coherence does not mean institutions are perfect. Physicians know that systems are restricted. They know that resources are finite, staffing is hard, and not every desired intervention is feasible. A system must have enough coherence for its ideals to serve as a guide. When an institution talks about person-centered care but rewards only volume, or talks about safety but normalizes unsafe staffing levels, its ideals, as anchors, become less useful.

Belonging does not mean sentimentality. Physicians do not need constant affirmation. They need enough shared moral reality to know they are not imagining the contradiction. When everyone sees the same problem, but each must manage it alone, isolation replaces professional community. Then, silence begins to resemble consensus.

These three conditions—belonging, coherence, and recognition—form the infrastructure of professional identity. When they weaken, doctors may remain technically capable but are less able to experience their work as an integrated expression of who they are. This is, by definition, an injury to self-identity.

When Institutions Stop Supporting Clinical Judgment

Many of the most consequential injuries in contemporary medicine occur because of a prior authorization request. A denial. A repeated documentation question. A message routed through multiple pools. A staffing grid. A discharge target.

Every element has a rationale. Prior authorization is defended as a form of utilization management. Documentation facilitates communications, billing, legal responsibility, and quality reporting. Metrics can reveal variation and inequity. Staffing models respond to real financial and labor constraints. None of this can be dismissed as bad faith.

The problem is not that systems have obligations beyond the individual clinical encounter. The problem arises when these obligations are operationalized in ways that repeatedly override, distrust, or fragment clinical judgment while leaving the physician morally visible to the patient and professionally accountable for the outcome. A treatment plan may require the approval of someone who will never meet the patient. A physician may document less to clarify thinking than to satisfy the downstream audit logic. The note becomes a legal, financial, regulatory, and algorithmic artifact. Studies of ambulatory practice have shown substantial time devoted to EHR and desk work, often exceeding direct patient face time [24-27].  AMA survey work has repeatedly documented physicians' concerns that prior authorization delays care, burdens practices, and, in some cases, contributes to abandonment or harm [28].

The exact numbers are less important here than the daily experience: a physician's judgment remains provisional until translated into the language of approval, and the patient often experiences the delay as part of care. Over time, these processes teach physicians where authority actually lies. The physician may still be regarded as responsible, but responsibility is increasingly separated from control. This separation is identity-altering.

Moral Injury and Institutional Contradiction

Moral distress, first developed in nursing ethics, describes the experience of knowing the ethically appropriate action but being constrained from taking it. Moral injury, developed largely in military and psychological literature, describes a wound to moral agency and moral identity when people participate in, witness, or are unable to prevent events that violate deeply held commitments [10-16].

In medicine, the phrase "moral injury" has gained traction because many clinicians believe the term "burnout" makes the problem sound too internal. Burnout can imply that the clinician has failed to withstand the heat. Moral injury shifts attention to the conditions under which clinicians are asked to work. It asks whether physicians are being held responsible for care while being prevented from providing the care they believe is clinically and ethically required [14-16].

The difference is not absolute. Exhaustion, depersonalization, moral distress, and identity injury can coexist. A physician can be tired, ethically restricted, and less recognizable to themselves at the same time. The purpose of separation is to prevent one kind of harm from being misinterpreted as another.

This distinction also helps avoid romanticizing physicians. Moral injury does not mean that the physician is always right or that the system is always wrong. It means that the work places the physician inside moral commitments that can be obstructed, divided, or contradicted by the structure of practice. A physician can accept oversight and still be injured by opacity. A physician can accept scarcity and still be harmed by dishonest mission language. A physician can accept accountability and still be destabilized when authority and responsibility repeatedly diverge.

When authority contracts, but responsibility remains, the physician's role changes. The physician may still sign the order, explain the delay, comfort the family, respond to the patient's message, and absorb the anger. Yet key decisions may have been determined by payer rules, staffing shortages, formulary limits, or administrative pathways that the physician did not design and cannot effectively change.

This creates an institutional contradiction. The physician is told to be patient-centered, while the schedule allows little time. Told to practice evidence-based medicine while approvals depend on non-transparent criteria. Told to communicate with empathy, while the inbox expands faster than human attention can follow. Told to stop burnout, while being asked to adapt to the same conditions that produce it.

Such a contradiction creates adjustment. Physicians become careful. They learn which battles to take on, which appeals are worth the evening, which phrases unlock approval, which concerns will disappear into committees, and when silence is the safest professional strategy. The injury is when moral action becomes increasingly expensive and increasingly selective.

How Physicians Learn to Become Smaller

One of the quietest outcomes of identity injury is narrowing. Narrowing is the gradual reduction of the physician's expressed professional self to what the system can tolerate.

At first, narrowing is practical. A physician anticipates denial and presents the second-best option sooner. A resident learns that raising a staffing concern may be interpreted as inefficiency rather than as a safety concern. A surgeon knows which postoperative resources are unavailable and adjusts the plan accordingly. A psychiatrist recommends the level of care most likely to be covered, rather than the ideal level. A primary care physician stops listing every unmet need because listing them all would make the visit impossible.

Again, these adaptations are often rational. It may be necessary to give patients something rather than nothing. They may reflect wisdom on how restricted systems actually work. They may prevent doctors from spending their finite moral energy on battles they cannot win that day.

However, adaptation has a moral afterlife. What starts as a compromise becomes a habit. What becomes a habit becomes style, and what becomes style can eventually be mistaken for character. Physicians who have learned to speak less may appear calm. The physician who no longer expects institutional responsiveness may appear to be a realist. The physician who no longer challenges specific constraints may appear efficient. From the outside, narrowing can be rewarded.

From the inside, it can feel like a loss of self. This is where Kohut's lens becomes useful without dominating the discussion. If the professional self depends on recognition, coherence, and belonging, then repeated nonrecognition teaches the self to expect less. If judgment rarely registers, the physician stops expecting it to. If institutional ideals are unreliable, the physician stops leaning on them. If colleagues privately experience the same contradiction but lack a shared space to name it, each clinician learns to carry it alone.

Narrowing often appears first in language. The physician says, 'It will never be approved,' before trying. 'There is no point escalating,' before asking. 'This is just how it works,' before deciding whether it should work that way. These statements may be accurate. They may also reveal that the system has shifted from an external obstacle to an internal expectation.

The result may be mistaken for resilience. It may be resignation. The physician continues, but with less reach, less voice, and less confidence that the full moral self has a place in the work.

Why Small Administrative Acts Matter

Large ethical failures in medicine usually gain attention. Dramatic errors, public scandals, egregious neglect, fraud, and preventable deaths are legible as events. They can be investigated, narrated, and condemned. The identity injury described here is different. It usually develops through ordinary acts that appear morally neutral.

A request is returned because a box is incomplete. A medication is denied because a prior step is not documented in the required language. A message goes unanswered because no one owns the decision. A form asks for information already in the record. No single act is decisive. Each can be defended. Each may be small enough to seem unworthy of protest. But repetition changes meaning. The system teaches through responses and non-responses. It teaches which forms of judgment are trusted, which forms are merely tolerated, and which forms must be translated before they count.

The repetition is especially powerful because it occurs in the middle of responsibility. The physician is not encountering bureaucracy as a detached observer. The physician encounters it while a patient waits, while a family asks for an answer, while a nurse needs an order, while a resident watches what kind of advocacy is possible, while the clock moves and the schedule fills.  This is why the injury can be hard to name. It does not necessarily feel traumatic. It may feel like another day. The physician becomes accustomed to the gap between clinical reality and institutional recognition. The gap becomes background. The background becomes practice.

Cumulative administrative abrasion is pedagogical. It instructs, without announcing itself as instruction. It says: "Your judgment matters, but only after approval. Your ideals matter, but only within functional limits; you did not choose.  Over the years, the physician learns where to invest in themselves. That learning may preserve functioning. It may also erode professional presence. The danger is not only that physicians leave medicine. The danger is that many remain in medicine while becoming progressively less able to inhabit the role they intended.

Wellness Is Necessary, But Not Enough

A fair account of burnout should not dismiss wellness. The problem starts when wellness is substituted for repair. A physician burdened by unnecessary documentation may benefit from stress management, but it does not eliminate that burden. A clinician morally distressed by unsafe discharge pressure may benefit from counseling, but counseling does not align with authority and responsibility.

Wellness interventions can support the doctor. They cannot fully repair a workplace structure that interferes repeatedly with the physician's ability to act with recognizable clinical and moral agency. When the need is official recognition, individual relaxation may feel like misrecognition.

This is not a rejection of individual care. It is a rejection of the substitution. The National Academies, the Surgeon General, and major reviews of burnout interventions have emphasized that clinician well-being demands focus on systems, structures, and organizational conditions, not only individual resilience [5,29-31]. A Kohut-informed reading adds that the system must support the physician's ability to remain professionally coherent.

That means a wellness program is most credible when paired with structural honesty. It should be able to say: we will help you rest, and we will reduce unnecessary work. We will provide counseling and examine the conditions that lead to moral distress. We will not ask you to become more resilient so that the system can remain less accountable.

Wellness is not the enemy. Substitution is.

What Repair Would Require

If some forms of burnout are, in part, injuries to professional identity, then repair must begin before collapse. A physician should not have to become impaired, disruptive, or ready to leave before the system recognizes that something is wrong. The earlier signs are quieter: fewer objections, more guarded recommendations, less visible advocacy, muted expectations, and the slow disappearance of moral voice.

The first task is recognition. Institutions must be willing to name the moral dimension of clinical work. It is not enough to say that physicians are stressed. They must be able to say when a policy places them in an ethically compromised position, when a workflow undermines judgment, when staffing makes the mission language unbelievable, or when documentation consumes the attention that should be devoted to patients.

Recognition does not require an immediate solution. A leader may not be able to repair every constraint quickly. But truthful acknowledgment matters. 'You are right; this process is harming care, and we will not pretend it is simply your coping problem' is not sentimentality. It is the beginning of institutional mirroring. It tells physicians that their perception has been registered.

The second task is aligning responsibility and authority. Physicians should not be held morally responsible for outcomes when they lack meaningful authority over the conditions that shape those outcomes. This does not mean physicians should decide every resource question alone. It means that when authority is removed from the bedside, accountability must be shared honestly. A system that overrides clinical judgment should own the consequences of that override.

The third task is a transparent rejection. Denial, delay, triage, and redirection may sometimes be unavoidable. But refusal should be timely, intelligible, evidence-based, and accountable. If an appeal succeeds, the system should learn from the reverse. If a denial is maintained, the reasoning should be clinically meaningful, rather than procedurally opaque. Transparency treats physicians as participants in the judgment, not simply submitters of paperwork.

The fourth task is burden reduction as moral reparation. Reducing low-value documentation, redesigning inbox workflows, supporting team-based care, improving EHR usability, streamlining prior authorization, and eliminating metrics that do not improve care are not simply efficiency projects. These are acts of recognition. They say that physician attention, clinical judgment, and time with patients are essential.

The fifth task is the restoration of credible ideals. Health care organizations often espouse values, but physicians evaluate them through their operations. Mission statements become credible when schedules, staffing, record-keeping requirements, and leadership decisions correspond visibly with them. Credibility requires sufficient congruence for doctors to still use institutional ideals as moral anchors.

The sixth mission is rebuilding belonging. Physicians need places where shared moral perception can be spoken and linked to action. Ethics rounds, peer groups, morbidity and mortality conferences that include system factors, interdisciplinary forums, leadership listening sessions, and protected spaces for residents and early-career physicians can all matter, if they are connected to institutional learning.

Concrete repair would look ordinary. A reversal of a prior authorization would trigger a review of the reasons for the initial denial. An EHR inbox redesign would ask which messages require physician judgment and which could be handled by protocol or team support. A documentation initiative would both remove and add requirements. A staffing decision would include the effect on moral risk, not only labor cost. A productivity target would be evaluated for its effect on attention, safety, and relational care.

Repair would also require leaders to distinguish between unavoidable limits and avoidable injury. Not every service can be provided, not every request can be approved, and not every ideal can be fully realized. But physicians can tolerate honest limits more readily than opaque contradiction. A system that says 'we cannot do this, and here is why' is different from one that says 'we are patient-centered' while leaving the patient and physician to absorb an unexplained refusal.

The seventh task is protecting the moral voice. A quiet physician workforce is not a healthy workforce. It may be a workforce that has learned the cost of speaking. Institutions should treat ethical concerns as a form of professionalism.

Lastly, measurements should be used with humility. Burnout scores, EHR time data, turnover rates, staffing metrics, prior authorization burden, and moral distress measures can reveal patterns. But dashboards cannot fully explain what suffering means. Numbers should guide listening.

These repairs will not make medicine easy. Medicine will always involve uncertainty, scarcity, suffering, loss, responsibility, and conflict. The goal is to make the work coherent enough that physicians can remain themselves while doing it.

Remaining Oneself in Medicine

The greatest danger of physician burnout is that they become less recognizable to themselves. The physician who once advocated without hesitation now calculates institutional tolerability. The physician who once trusted the stated mission now listens to operational reality. Kohut helps name this injury, but the injury itself belongs to medicine. Physicians do not need to become psychoanalysts to recognize it. They need language for what happens when recognition, coherence, and belonging fail inside the work that formed them.

Burnout is a useful word, but it is not always enough. It names the visible depletion. Moral distress and moral injury name ethical constraints and harm to moral agency. Professional identity formation explains why medicine is not simply a set of tasks, but a way of becoming. Kohut helps explain how the professional self can be destabilized when the environment no longer supports the conditions that make this self-coherent.

The solution cannot be only personal endurance. Resilience may help physicians survive difficult systems, but survival is not the same as repair. A health care system worthy of its professionals must reduce unnecessary burden, align responsibility with authority, protect moral voice, restore credible ideals, and rebuild community. It must stop treating silence as proof that physicians have adapted and begin considering whether silence may be evidence of injury.

The most serious loss is not always departure. Sometimes, the physician stays and becomes quieter. The work continues: rounding, prescribing, documenting, counseling, calling, transferring, discharging, appealing, reassuring. Patients can still experience skill and kindness. Institutions can still record productivity. But fewer doctors may be present at work.

Some forms of burnout are not just exhaustion. They are the gradual loss of professional self-recognition under conditions that make it harder to maintain the full physician self.

That is the injury this essay tries to name. And naming it is necessary because doctors cannot repair a loss; they can only describe it as fatigue.

The task is to build clinical environments in which vulnerability, judgment, obligation, and moral presence can remain connected. The physician needs conditions that are honest and coherent enough to sustain the person who keeps returning to work.

References

[1] Freudenberger HJ. Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues. 1974;30(1):159-165. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x.

[2] Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1981;2(2):99-113. doi:10.1002/job. 4030020205.

[3] Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):103-111. doi:10.1002/wps. 20311.

[4] World Health Organization. Burnout is an occupational phenomenon: International Classification of Diseases. 2019.

[5] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Taking Action Against Clinician Burnout: A Systems Approach to Professional Well-Being. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2019. doi:10.17226/25521.

[6] Rotenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, et al. Prevalence of burnout among physicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2018;320(11):1131-1150. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12777.

[7] West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: contributors, consequences, and solutions. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2018;283(6):516-529. doi:10.1111/joim. 12752.

[8] Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive leadership and physician well-being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2017;92(1):129-146. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004.

[9] Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From Triple to Quadruple Aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Annals of Family Medicine. 2014;12(6):573-576. doi:10.1370/afm. 1713.

[10] Jameton A. Nursing Practice: The Ethical Issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.

[11] Epstein EG, Hamric AB. Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2009;20(4):330-342.

[12] Litz BT, Stein N, Delaney E, et al. Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: a preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review. 2009;29(8):695-706. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003.

[13] Shay J. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character. New York: Scribner; 1994.

[14] Dean W, Talbot S, Dean A. Reframing clinician distress: moral injury not burnout. Federal Practitioner. 2019;36(9):400-402.

[15] Dean W, Morris D, Manzur MK, Talbot S. Moral injury in health care: a unified definition and its relationship to burnout. Federal Practitioner. 2024;41(4):104-107. doi:10.12788/fp. 0467.

[16] Mantri S, Lawson JM, Wang Z, Koenig HG. Identifying moral injury in healthcare professionals: the Moral Injury Symptom Scale-HP. Journal of Religion and Health. 2020;59(5):2323-2340. doi:10.1007/s10943-020-01065-w.

[17] Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Academic Medicine. 2014;89(11):1446-1451. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427.

[18] Jarvis-Selinger S, Pratt DD, Regehr G. Competency is not enough: integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse. Academic Medicine. 2012;87(9):1185-1190. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182604968.

[19] Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Academic Medicine. 1994;69(11):861-871. doi:10.1097/00001888-199411000-00001.

[20] Kohut H. The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. New York: International Universities Press; 1971.

[21] Kohut H. The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press; 1977.

[22] Kohut H. How Does Analysis Cure? Edited by Goldberg A, Stepansky PE. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1984.

[23] Banai E, Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. 'Selfobject' needs in Kohut's self psychology: links with attachment, self-cohesion, affect regulation, and adjustment. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 2005;22(2):224-260. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.22.2.224.

[24] Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016;165(11):753-760. doi:10.7326/M16-0961.

[25] Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD, et al. Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Annals of Family Medicine. 2017;15(5):419-426. doi:10.1370/afm. 2121.

[26] Tai-Seale M, Olson CW, Li J, et al. Electronic health record logs indicate that physicians split time evenly between seeing patients and desktop medicine. Health Affairs. 2017;36(4):655-662. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0811.

[27] Rotenstein LS, Holmgren AJ, Downing NL, Bates DW. System-level factors and time spent on electronic health records by primary care physicians. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(11):e2344713. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44713.

[28] American Medical Association. 2025 AMA Prior Authorization Physician Survey. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2026.

[29] Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, et al. Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2017;177(2):195-205. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674.

[30] West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2272-2281. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X.

[31] Office of the Surgeon General. Addressing Health Worker Burnout: The U.S. Surgeon General's Advisory on Building a Thriving Health Workforce. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2022.